Month: June 2001

Disabling Smart Tags under Apache 1.2 and later

From Red Hat Apache Guru Mark Cox, via Drew Meeks at Red Hat:

Adding

Header add MSSmartTagsPreventParsing "TRUE"

to httpd.conf should add the response header to every page served.

Mark and Drew haven’t tested this, but I pass it along. You can test the efficacy of this approach at http://209.204.184.53/, which returns both

MSSmartTagsPreventParsing: TRUE
X-Meta-MSSmartTagsPreventParsing: TRUE

as response headers, the latter since X-Meta-Foo in the response headers is interpreted by some browsers as equivalent to a <META name=”Foo”> tag. http://209.204.184.50/ returns the same content without the above headers.

Requires that mod_headers is installed on your copy of Apache: See http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/mod_headers.html. You can alter the scope of this by placing the “Header” directive inside a VirtualHost, Directory, Location, or Files directive.

I grabbed the whole thing incase the refered site disapears in the future.

Disabling Smart Tags under Apache 1.2 and later

From Red Hat Apache Guru Mark Cox, via Drew Meeks at Red Hat:

Adding

Header add MSSmartTagsPreventParsing "TRUE"

to httpd.conf should add the response header to every page served.

Mark and Drew haven’t tested this, but I pass it along. You can test the efficacy of this approach at http://209.204.184.53/, which returns both

MSSmartTagsPreventParsing: TRUE
X-Meta-MSSmartTagsPreventParsing: TRUE

as response headers, the latter since X-Meta-Foo in the response headers is interpreted by some browsers as equivalent to a <META name=”Foo”> tag. http://209.204.184.50/ returns the same content without the above headers.

Requires that mod_headers is installed on your copy of Apache: See http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/mod_headers.html. You can alter the scope of this by placing the “Header” directive inside a VirtualHost, Directory, Location, or Files directive.

I grabbed the whole thing incase the refered site disapears in the future.

Finally got stats working on fozbaca, since the move to the ufies box (thanks tiggersol), and the number 1 search string “interesting stuff”. Some more intresting ones “cummunism” and “she wet her”, don’t ask me why.

Finally got stats working on fozbaca, since the move to the ufies box (thanks tiggersol), and the number 1 search string “interesting stuff”. Some more intresting ones “cummunism” and “she wet her”, don’t ask me why.

More Overheated Porn Hysteria
this time in the Canadian Navy.

Commodore Eric Lerhe, the chief of the Canadian Pacific fleet, has been suspended from duty and faces a possible court-martial. For high treason? No, for looking at porn on the web.

Now what do ya’ll native Canadians have to comment?

A man does not sexually harass women because he reads pornography. A man sexually harasses women because he’s an asshole.

is probably the best rebuttle to the whole “porn makes men evil to women” angle.

More Overheated Porn Hysteria
this time in the Canadian Navy.

Commodore Eric Lerhe, the chief of the Canadian Pacific fleet, has been suspended from duty and faces a possible court-martial. For high treason? No, for looking at porn on the web.

Now what do ya’ll native Canadians have to comment?

A man does not sexually harass women because he reads pornography. A man sexually harasses women because he’s an asshole.

is probably the best rebuttle to the whole “porn makes men evil to women” angle.

Katie could be a useful tool for the source code revision woes at work. What do ya think all?

Katie could be a useful tool for the source code revision woes at work. What do ya think all?

To follow up on my last post, i just saw a link on pricewatch that has 256 megs of Mac memory for $32. Sorry, considering going from a 500 Mhz chip to a 600 Mhz chip is about $100, but QUADRUPLING by memory to insane levels is about $32….. it is so foolish for Apple to sell anything less than 256 megs of RAM in any of their products.

I know that RAM is supposed to be an upsell, but heck, why not make SURE that everyone has plenty of RAM, and upsell things like digital cameras and other accessories that *gasp* use memory.

If I didn’t already have 160 megs of memory in my iMac (which, if you are not using classic, feels likea decent but not awesome amount) I would buy a big ol’ 256 megs stick of RAM and have 384 megs….

To follow up on my last post, i just saw a link on pricewatch that has 256 megs of Mac memory for $32. Sorry, considering going from a 500 Mhz chip to a 600 Mhz chip is about $100, but QUADRUPLING by memory to insane levels is about $32….. it is so foolish for Apple to sell anything less than 256 megs of RAM in any of their products.

I know that RAM is supposed to be an upsell, but heck, why not make SURE that everyone has plenty of RAM, and upsell things like digital cameras and other accessories that *gasp* use memory.

If I didn’t already have 160 megs of memory in my iMac (which, if you are not using classic, feels likea decent but not awesome amount) I would buy a big ol’ 256 megs stick of RAM and have 384 megs….