I just read the thing on whether or not competition has a purpose. While i like what the guy is trying to do, and the list of masters, i think that his method is a little screwed up. Assigning positive, negative, and neutral numbers to a complex issue is not exactly the best way to examine something. Life is just a little too complicated ( in orders of magnitude) for that.
So i like the guy’s theory, but wouldn’t use his reasoning to back up any serious argument.